2PP103 – 10 April 2015

2pp_album_art_110x1101.jpgWe thought we’d try something a little different for this episode: Talking about things we don’t like about President Obama. Before we actually get into that, we have a bit of banter about—something. We actually have joked like this all our lives, but Arthur was a little punchy. Arthur then talks about one thing he doesn’t like about President Obama, then Jason mentions one of his, and we’re off! Along the way, we also talk about quite a few topical issues.

Next time, a “normal” episode. Well, we hope so, anyway…

Everyone’s welcome to leave a comment (agree or disagree!).

Links for this episode:
JEOPARDY! plus 180 months – One of Roger Green’s posts Arthur mentioned
Or, just check out Roger’s blog—Arthur highly recommends it!
Jason’s Blog
Arthur’s blog, podcasts and videos can be accessed here.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Podcast Shownotes and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 2PP103 – 10 April 2015

  1. Roger Green says:

    Won $17,600 om my appearance on November 9, 1998.

  2. Thanks! If I’d been more diligent, or had a better memory, I may have been able to share that. But, it is what is, so thanks for filling in the blanks that I couldn’t!

  3. Jason Peaco says:

    Not bad at all Roger. Just curious how much did you get to keep after taxes.

  4. Roger Green says:

    I got a check for $17,600, but I had to add it to my income, so yes, I got slapped with some taxes, but couldn’t give you a dollar amount.

  5. Roger Green says:

    Re: projecting strength: I have been convinced that, at least since he first ran for the US Senate in IL, I think Obama has desired not to project the image of the “angry black man.”

  6. Roger Green says:

    Ultimately, the Tea Party, which $tarted in 2002 – http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/11/1186268/-Koch-Planning-Tea-Party-Since-2002-New-Research-Paper-Reveals – was in full $wing by April 2009. It was alway$ de$igned for Obama to fail, with those “$pontaneou$” demon$tration$ orchestrated from the $tart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *